Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
Sponsor: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the the Nexgen knee replacement system using cementless fixation with the same system using cemented fixation. At minimum 2-year follow-up, the hypothesis is that NexGen total knee arthroplasties using cementless and cemented fixation will demonstrate no differences in clinical outcome based on Oxford and Knee Society scores, patient-assessed visual analog pain, clinical complications, radiographic fixation and implant survivorship.
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement: Results of a New Modular Trabecular Metal Tibial Component Using the NexGen System
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
Any - 75 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
100
Start Date
2010-04
Completion Date
2026-12
Last Updated
2023-07-24
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation
High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation