Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV
Sponsor: Evald Hoej Christiansen
Summary
How should coronary artery stenoses with significant side branch be stented? A strategy of stenting both main vessel and side branch compared to a strategy of stenting the main vessel and only stenting the side branch if necessary. The 2-stent strategy is superior to the 1-stent strategy regarding occurrence of cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction and re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Official title: How Should Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branch be Stented? A Strategy of Stenting Both Main Vessel and Side Branch Compared to a Strategy of Stenting the Main Vessel and Only Stenting the Side Branch if Necessary.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
450
Start Date
2008-12
Completion Date
2026-01
Last Updated
2026-01-02
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with no side branch treatment
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with stenting of main vessel and side branch
Locations (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark