Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sponsor: Seung-Jung Park
Summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guided(optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided) and IVUS-guided(Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided) strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) for significant obstructive Coronary artery disease (CAD). The investigators hypothesize that OCT-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to primary end point of target-vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction \[MI\], or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization \[TVR\]) at 1 year after randomization.
Official title: A Prospective, Open Label, Multi-center, Dual Arm, Randomized, Pragmatic Trial : Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
19 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
2008
Start Date
2018-04-12
Completion Date
2027-01-31
Last Updated
2026-01-02
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
PCI
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Locations (9)
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, South Korea
Konyang University Hospital
Daejeon, South Korea
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, South Korea
Pusan National University Hospital
Pusan, South Korea
Asan Medical Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Chung-Ang university hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Kyung hee university hospital
Seoul, South Korea