Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
FFR Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in NSTEMI Patients and Multivessel Disease
Sponsor: Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
Summary
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Official title: Ischemia (FFR) Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Diseases: The South Limburg Myocardial Infarction Study Group The SLIM Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 85 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
476
Start Date
2018-06-07
Completion Date
2027-07
Last Updated
2025-08-15
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Ischemia driven revascularization
In the ischemia driven complete revascularisation strategy group all flow limiting (FFR ≤ 0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting during the index intervention
Usual care group
In the randomised to usual care group the procedure will stop after the PCI of the culprit artery and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist and/ or heart team who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non- IRA artery should take place. If the treating cardiologist (after advise of the heart team) decides to perform the non-IRA PCI revascularisation, than such treatment should take place within six weeks from the primary PCI in order to count as a scheduled staged PCI procedure.
Locations (9)
Brno University Hospital
Brno, Czechia
Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet
Budapest, Hungary
Bacs-Kiskun Teaching Hospital
Kecskemét, Hungary
Szeged University
Szeged, Hungary
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Zuyderland MC
Heerlen, Netherlands
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Viecuri Medisch Centrum
Venlo, Netherlands