Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer Trials (DATECAN-1)
Sponsor: Institut Bergonié
Summary
In randomised phase III cancer clinical trials, the most objectively defined and only validated time-to-event endpoint is overall survival (OS). The appearance of new types of treatments and the multiplication of lines of treatment have resulted in the use of surrogate endpoints for overall survival such as progression-free survival (PFS), or time-to-treatment failure. Their development is strongly influenced by the necessity of reducing clinical trial duration, cost and number of patients. However, while these endpoints are frequently used, they are often poorly defined and definitions can differ between trials which may limit their use as primary endpoints. Moreover, this variability of definitions can impact on the trial's results by affecting estimation of treatments' effects. The aim of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project is to provide recommendations for standardised definitions of time-to-event endpoints in randomised cancer clinical trials. We will use a formal consensus methodology based on experts' opinions which will be obtained in a systematic manner. Definitions will be independently developed for several cancer sites, including pancreatic, breast, head and neck and colon cancer, as well as sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). The DATECAN project should lead to the elaboration of recommendations that can then be used as guidelines by researchers participating in clinical trials. This process should lead to a standardisation of the definitions of commonly used time-to-event endpoints, enabling appropriate comparisons of future trials' results.
Official title: Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer Trials (DATECAN-1) : Formal Consensus Method for the Development of Guidelines for Standardized Time-to-event Endpoints' Definitions in Cancer Clinical Trials
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 100 Years
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
265
Start Date
2009-09
Completion Date
2026-12
Last Updated
2025-12-10
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Sarcoma and GIST
No Intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.
Breast cancer
No intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.
Pancreatic cancer
No intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.
Renal cell carcinoma
No intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.
Colon cancer
No intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy (adjuvant setting).
Solid tumours undergoing image-guided tumor ablation
No intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.
(early) Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
No intervention : Consensus of international experts to provide definition of survival endpoints to be used in randomized controlled trials to assess treatment efficacy.
Locations (3)
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, France
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, France
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier, France