Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Gravity Versus Vacuum Based Indwelling Tunneled Pleural Drainage System
Sponsor: Johns Hopkins University
Summary
Malignant pleural effusion remains a debilitating complication of end stage cancer, which can be greatly improved by the introduction of the indwelling tunneled pleural catheter (IPC). However, there is no standard of care regarding drainage and limited data on the utility of different drainage techniques. In addition, many patients develop discomfort and chest pain during drainage. The investigators propose to evaluate gravity drainage and suction drainage on quality of life measures and outcomes.
Official title: The Impact of a Gravity Versus Vacuum Based Indwelling Tunneled Pleural Drainage System on Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
200
Start Date
2019-01-31
Completion Date
2026-12-31
Last Updated
2025-12-17
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Vacuum-Based IPC
An indwelling pleural catheter is placed inside the chest cavity to drain fluid from around the lungs. One end remains inside the body while the other drains via suction.
Gravity-Based IPC
An indwelling pleural catheter is placed inside the chest cavity to drain fluid from around the lungs. One end remains inside the body while the other drains via gravity.
Locations (6)
Northwest Community Healthcare
Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom