Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
PET/MR Versus CECT Scans in Imaging Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer
Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Summary
This trial studies how well positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) versus contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scans work in locating ovarian cancer tumors in patients with known or suspected ovarian cancer. PET, MR, and CECT scans use different methods to create images of areas inside the body. This trial is being done to see if PET/MR scans may help doctors locate ovarian cancer tumors, predict how well these tumors may be removed during surgery, and predict how patients respond to platinum-based chemotherapies compared to standard of care CECT scans.
Official title: Comparing Accuracy of PET/MR vs. CECT in Assessment of Peritoneal Disease for Resectability in Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
21
Start Date
2018-05-12
Completion Date
2027-04-30
Last Updated
2025-10-14
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Dynamic Enhanced CT
Undergo standard CECT
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo PET/MRI scan
Positron Emission Tomography
Undergo PET/MRI scan
Locations (1)
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States