Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
NCT03965481
NA

PET/MR Versus CECT Scans in Imaging Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer

Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This trial studies how well positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) versus contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scans work in locating ovarian cancer tumors in patients with known or suspected ovarian cancer. PET, MR, and CECT scans use different methods to create images of areas inside the body. This trial is being done to see if PET/MR scans may help doctors locate ovarian cancer tumors, predict how well these tumors may be removed during surgery, and predict how patients respond to platinum-based chemotherapies compared to standard of care CECT scans.

Official title: Comparing Accuracy of PET/MR vs. CECT in Assessment of Peritoneal Disease for Resectability in Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

21

Start Date

2018-05-12

Completion Date

2027-04-30

Last Updated

2025-10-14

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

RADIATION

Dynamic Enhanced CT

Undergo standard CECT

PROCEDURE

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Undergo PET/MRI scan

PROCEDURE

Positron Emission Tomography

Undergo PET/MRI scan

Locations (1)

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States