Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Sequential and Comparative Evaluation of Pain Treatment Effectiveness Response
Sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
Summary
VETERANS ONLY. Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is common. Most Americans will have at least one episode of low back pain in their lifetimes. Approximately 50% of all US Veterans have chronic pain, and CLBP is the most common type of pain in this population. This study will use a sequential randomized, pragmatic, 2-step comparative effectiveness study design. The main goal is to identify the best approach for treating cLBP using commonly recommended non-surgical and non-pharmacological options. The first step compares continued care and active monitoring (CCAM) to internet-based pain self-management (Pain EASE) and an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines Pain EASE with tailored exercise and physical activity. Patients who do not have a significant decrease in pain interference (a functional outcome) in Step 1 and those desiring additional treatment will be randomized in Step 2 to yoga, spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), or therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants proceeding to randomization in Step 2 will be allowed to exclude up to one of the three Step 2 treatments based on their preferences. The investigators' primary hypothesis for the first treatment step is that an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines pain self-management education with a tailored exercise program will reduce pain interference greater than internet-based pain self-management alone or CCAM in Veterans with cLBP. The primary outcome is change in pain interference at 3 months, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. Study participants will be followed for one year after initiation of their final study treatments to assess the durability of treatment effects. The study plans to randomize 2529 patients across 20 centers.
Official title: CSP #2009 - Sequential and Comparative Evaluation of Pain Treatment Effectiveness Response: The SCEPTER Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
Any - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
2529
Start Date
2022-06-13
Completion Date
2027-12-31
Last Updated
2025-05-16
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Pain EASE
The internet-based pain self-management program consists of open access to the Pain EASE program (Pain E-health for Activity, Skills, and Education) for the duration of participation in the trial. Pain EASE has 10 pain coping skill modules: pain education, setting personal goals, planning meaningful activities, physical activity (stretching, body mechanics, and a pedometer-based walking program), relaxation, developing healthy thinking patterns, pacing and problem-solving, improving sleep, effective communication, and future planning.
Tailored exercise
Findings from the initial examination and the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool (Hill, et al., 2011) will be used by the physical therapist to guide and tailor the intervention to individual participants which will involve up to 8 treatment sessions with ongoing home exercise. For most participants, exercise and physical activity will focus on walking in addition to motor control and stabilization exercises for the low back with flexibility exercises when lumbar spine stiffness is present.
Continued Care and Active Monitoring
CCAM will not be standardized keeping in line with the pragmatic nature of this trial. CCAM may be variable across sites and for individual participants reflecting de facto clinical practice for cLBP. Clinical practice may involve pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for cLBP. Current analgesics (including opioids, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, topical analgesics (capsaicin), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, skeletal muscle relaxants, and alpha-2-delta ligands (gabapentin-like drugs)) and non-pharmacological treatments may be continued by participants. CCAM participants will be encouraged to discuss pain problems with their treating physician, but not begin new treatments if possible. Patients will specifically be discouraged from starting CBT, chiropractic, or yoga. Other than this, there will be no attempt by study personnel to influence pain management.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Participants randomized to CBT in Step 2 will receive treatment with a trained therapist using the VA's CBT-chronic pain (CBT-CP) protocol involving one planning session and 9 treatment sessions (10 total) over 3 months. The VA's CBT-CP protocol consists of 11 core CBT-CP modules that can be completed in up to 10 sessions. Weekly, individual sessions of 45-50 minutes are recommended, although it is recognized that bi-weekly or other arrangements are often made to fit practical needs.
Spinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT)
After examination by a qualified Doctor of Chiropractic (DC), a SMT intervention consisting of up to 10 sessions over 3 months will be designed focusing on spinal manipulation and/or mobilization of the lower thoracic, lumbar and/or sacroiliac joints. Adjunctive use of myofascial and/or stretching techniques are allowed as they are commonly used along with SMT, and can be considered a standard accompaniment to SMT.
Yoga
The Yoga for Veterans with cLBP program consists of up to 10 weekly, 60-minute instructor-led sessions along with 15-20 minutes of yoga practiced at home each non-session day. The initial session is 75 minutes (15 minutes longer than the other sessions). The yoga program can be considered classical hatha yoga with influences from Iyengar and Viniyoga yoga. These styles emphasize modifications and adaptations including the use of props such as straps and blocks to minimize the risk of injury and make the poses accessible to people with health problems and limitations (Iyengar, 1979). The instructor leads participants through a series of 23 yoga poses (32 total variations) at a slow-moderate pace.
Locations (19)
Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA
Loma Linda, California, United States
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, California, United States
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, California, United States
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Bay Pines VA Healthcare System, Pay Pines, FL
Bay Pines, Florida, United States
Orlando VA Medical Center, Orlando, FL
Orlando, Florida, United States
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO
St Louis, Missouri, United States
VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System, North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Asheville VA Medical Center, Asheville, NC
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Portland, Oregon, United States
South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, Texas, United States
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Hampton VA Medical Center, Hampton, VA
Hampton, Virginia, United States
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Richmond, Virginia, United States