Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites
Sponsor: Hacettepe University
Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch\&rinse).
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
28
Start Date
2017-11-01
Completion Date
2026-11-01
Last Updated
2025-12-03
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Constic
Flowable resin composite
G-ænial Universal Flo
Flowable resin composite
Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)
Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, self-etch mode)
Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)
Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, etch\&rinse mode)
Locations (1)
Hacettepe University
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)