Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Hyperbaric Prilocaine Compared With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Cervical Cerclage?
Sponsor: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Summary
Patients that have a "cervical stitch" (cervical cerclage) require an anaesthetic. The most common choice is a spinal block. This is an injection in the back that makes the lower half of the body become temporarily numb and weak. The key aims when choosing which type of anaesthetic are safety for mother and baby, comfort during and after the procedure as well as patient convenience and satisfaction. There are two commonly available choices for the drug used in spinal anaesthesia, bupivacaine and prilocaine. Both have a long history of being safe and effective. One difference observed in studies of these drugs used for spinal anaesthetics in other surgeries is that prilocaine is shorter-acting and it, therefore, takes less time for the return of full strength and sensation of the lower body. This means patients are able to leave hospital sooner and are less likely to need a urinary catheter. The investigators want to see if these benefits can apply to patients having a cervical stitch too, by comparing the recovery of patients having a spinal anaesthetic with one of these two local anaesthetic medications.
Official title: Does Subarachnoid Administration of Hyperbaric Prilocaine Produce an Improved Recovery From Anaesthesia When Compared With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine When Used to Make Cervical Cerclage Easier in Pregnant Women at Risk of Pre-term Loss?
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
129
Start Date
2021-08-27
Completion Date
2025-08-20
Last Updated
2026-06-08
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Prilocaine (Hyperbaric 2%)
2 ml hyperbaric prilocaine
Bupivacaine (Hyperbaric 0.5%)
2 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine
Locations (1)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom