Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- Study
Sponsor: Helsinki University Central Hospital
Summary
The main objective of the study is to compare subjective efficacy of trans vaginal mesh and laparoscopic colposakropexy (CSP) in women with an apical prolapse. The CSP group is further divided into two sub-groups; one where the mesh fixation is only at the apical part of the vagina, and another where the fixation is also extended to the levator plane. The secondary outcomes are safety (peri- and post-surgery complications, pain, erosion), objective efficacy (simplified POP-Q), and re-operation rate. Subjective outcome also includes the assessment of sexual satisfaction. Cost-effectiveness is studied by comparing both direct costs and QALYs.
Official title: Women's Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment - a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transvaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Surgery
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - 99 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
318
Start Date
2020-07-01
Completion Date
2032-12
Last Updated
2025-09-24
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
TVM
Transvaginal mesh operation using BSC mesh (A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria)
Colposacropexy
Colposacropexy using EndoGYNious mesh (A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria)
Locations (1)
Helsinki Naistenklinikka
Helsinki, Finland