Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
NCT04615260
NA

Rate of Bony Fusion Using NanoBone® Synthetic Bone Graft Versus Local Autologous Bone Graft.

Sponsor: Artoss Inc.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The objectives of this longitudinal study are to assess and measure fusion status (fused or not fused) and rate of bony fusion using NanoBone® Synthetic Bone Graft in patients requiring one to two level lumbar posterolateral fusion procedures with or without commercially available rigid spinal instrumentation. Our hypothesis is that the Nanobone synthetic bone graft will be as effective at creating a fusion in the lumbar spine as compared with a local bone graft. Each subject will serve as their own control during this study, as patients will receive the Nanobone graft on the right side of their spine and the local bone graft on their left side.

Official title: Comparison of Fusion Success Between NanoBone Synthetic Bone Graft and Local Autogenous Bone Graft in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 85 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

40

Start Date

2021-07-19

Completion Date

2025-04-30

Last Updated

2025-02-12

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

NanoBone

Nanobone® Synthetic Bone Graft is a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite imbedded in a silica gel matrix. The nanocrystalline structure accurately replicates autologous hydroxyapatite and the silica gel matrix that rapidly transforms into an osteogenic matrix post-implantation. NanoBone promotes remodeling by acting as a strong osteoinductive material. NanoBone® is available as a putty.

Locations (1)

UMass Memorial Health Care

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States