Clinical Research Directory

Long vs Extended-short Nail When Treating Proximal Femur Fractures

Sponsor: Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

Summary

Fractures of the upper part of the femur may be treated with intramedullary nails. There are different designs to choose from. The intention of this RCT is to compare two nails with some of the same properties, but with different lengths. Usually, it is the surgeon who decides which nail to be used. The literature indicates that there is a lack of good evidence in the decision-making, and that the choice often depends on personal preferences and experience of the surgeon. Therefore, the investigators want to compare whether one of the nails has a better outcome than the other, and in that way be able to give some clearer guidelines for treatment. Patients will be randomized into two groups, one receiving a long nail and one receiving an extended-short nail and compare surgical and functional outcomes. Information from the operation and subsequent check-ups will be analysed. The hypothesis is that the extended-short nail can reduce operating time, bleeding, fluoroscopy time and give equal or better functional outcome, without increasing reoperation rates or mortality.

Official title: Long vs Extended-short Nail When Treating Proximal Femur Fractures - An RCT-study Examining Differences in Functional and Surgical Outcomes

Key Details

Conditions

Interventions

Locations (2)