Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Effects of Dextrose Prolotherapy in Rotator Cuff Disease
Sponsor: Istanbul University
Summary
The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic effects of dextrose prolotherapy on pain, shoulder function, range of motion, and ultrasonographic findings in patients with MRI-confirmed chronic rotator cuff disease. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either dextrose prolotherapy or lidocaine-saline injections. Both groups followed a standardized home-based exercise program.
Official title: Effects of Dextrose Prolotherapy in Rotator Cuff Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
30 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
60
Start Date
2021-03-18
Completion Date
2021-11-12
Last Updated
2026-07-02
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Dextrose prolotherapy injection
Dextrose prolotherapy injections were administered at baseline, week 3, and week 6 using an ultrasound-guided anatomical marking technique. A 15% dextrose solution was prepared using 30% dextrose, saline, and 1% lidocaine. Extra-articular injections were administered with a 27-gauge needle using the peppering technique at five previously marked anatomical points, including the long head of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove, the subscapularis insertion at the lesser tuberosity, the supraspinatus insertion at the greater tuberosity, the infraspinatus insertion at the greater tuberosity, and the coracoid process region. One milliliter was injected at each point. Subacromial injection was performed via a posterior approach using a 21-gauge needle, and 4 mL of solution was injected into the subacromial bursa. All participants also received a standardized home-based exercise program.
Lidocaine-saline injection
Lidocaine-saline injections were administered at baseline, week 3, and week 6 using the same ultrasound-guided anatomical marking technique and anatomical targets as the prolotherapy group. Extra-articular injections were prepared using saline and 1% lidocaine and were administered superficially at approximately 0.5-1 cm depth using a 26-gauge needle at five previously marked sites to mimic the prolotherapy injection procedure. One milliliter was injected at each site. Subacromial injection was performed via a posterior approach using a 21-gauge needle, and 4 mL of lidocaine-saline solution was injected into the subacromial bursa. All participants also received a standardized home-based exercise program.
Locations (1)
Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)