Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Balloon vs. Self Expanding Transcatheter Valve for Degenerated Bioprosthesis
Sponsor: Erasmus Medical Center
Summary
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) serves a growing spectrum of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). Approximately 80% of surgical aortic valve replacements is performed using a bioprosthesis1. Durability of surgical bioprostheses varies based on the patient's age at the moment of implantation, type and size etc2. TAVI has become the preferred treatment for degenerated aortic bioprostheses in elderly patients3. The median time since index surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and for bioprosthetic valve degeneration is typically 8 - 10 years4-6. TAVI in this setting has proven to have equally favorable results as in native aortic valves7. Balloon expandable8 and self-expanding9 transcatheter heart valves (THV) can be used in a degenerated bioprosthesis and each have specific assets and limitations. TAVI in a failed bioprosthesis can cause coronary obstruction, THV migration, paravalvular leakage and prosthesis patient mismatch. The SAPIEN-3 / Ultra and EVOLUT R/Pro are the 2 most commonly used THV platforms in contemporary clinical practice including treatment of failing surgical aortic bioprostheses. Objective: To compare TAVI with EVOLUT R/Pro vs. SAPIEN-3 / Ultra in terms of device success. Study design: International multi-center randomized study with 1:1 randomization to TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra or Evolut R/Pro. Study population: 440 patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis (aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation) and selected for transfemoral TAVI by heart-team consensus. Investigational intervention: Transfemoral TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra or Evolut R/PRO Main study parameters/endpoints: 1. Primary endpoint is device success at 30 days Defined by * Absence of procedural mortality AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location AND * Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (no severe prosthesis- patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation). Severe prosthesis patient mismatch is defined by effective orifice area (EOAi) ≤0.65 cm2/m2 2. Safety endpoint at 1 year defined by the composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, rehospitalization for heart failure or valve related problems.
Official title: Balloon Expandable vs. Self Expanding Transcatheter Valve for Degenerated Bioprosthesis. THE BASELINE TRIAL.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
65 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
400
Start Date
2021-05-01
Completion Date
2026-05-01
Last Updated
2022-07-27
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Evolut R/PRO bioprosthesis
To compare Evolut R/PRO versus Sapien S3/Ultra in failing surgical bioprostheses
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Locations (14)
Cedars Sinai
Los Angeles, California, United States
Vienna General Hospital
Vienna, Austria
St Paul's and Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, Canada
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Institut Cœur Poumon
Lille, France
Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Medical Center Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
Düsseldorf, Germany
University Hospital Mainz
Mainz, Germany
Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
Athens, Greece
Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Fondazione Poliambulanza Institute, Brescia, Italy
Brescia, Italy
University Hospital of Padova
Padua, Italy
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental
Lisbon, Portugal
Inselspital, University Hospital
Bern, Switzerland
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Leeds, United Kingdom