Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Sponsor: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Summary
Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (+/- aortic lymph node dissection) is the standard treatment for early stage cervical cancer. And minimally invasive surgery has been successfully and safely demonstrated in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer. This study aims to compare total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and total abdominal radical hysterectomy in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. Rates and characteristics of recurrence, incidence of complications and morbidity, impact on quality of life and cost-effectiveness will also be determined.
Official title: Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy (MITOR) for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
820
Start Date
2023-09
Completion Date
2033-07
Last Updated
2023-02-10
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
radical hysterectomy
To compare disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with early stage cervical cancer undergoing total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus total abdominal radical hysterectomy
Locations (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, Taiwan