Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison of Synthetic Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography in Image Interpretation and Performance Metrics
Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Summary
This study compares synthetic mammography to full-field digital mammography in image interpretation and performance metrics. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has previously been found to be superior in performance to standard digital mammography in both screening and diagnostic settings for the early detection and improved diagnosis of breast cancers. DBT in combination with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) reduces recall rates and increases cancer detection rates relative to FFDM alone. Synthetic mammography is a 2-dimensional reconstructed image, using the dataset derived from the DBT acquisition, without requiring additional radiation dose. Collecting information from patients' medical records may help doctors analyze the characteristics, utility, and impact of synthetic mammography to compared to FFDM.
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
750
Start Date
2020-12-15
Completion Date
2026-10-31
Last Updated
2025-10-14
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Electronic Health Record Review
Review of medical records and past imaging examinations
Locations (1)
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States