Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
Sponsor: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of surgery for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse to determine which surgery works best from a patient's perspective and has the lowest number of short-term and long-term complications.
Official title: Patient-Centered Outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy Versus Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
18 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
300
Start Date
2021-12-15
Completion Date
2038-05-31
Last Updated
2026-04-02
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Minimally invasive supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy (MI-SCH+SCP)
Minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy will be done, and the vaginal apex (including cervix) will be suspended utilizing sacrocolpopexy mesh to the anterior spinous ligament.
Vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (TVH+USLS)
The uterus will be removed vaginally and the vaginal apex will be suspended utilizing sutures in the uterosacral ligament.
Locations (7)
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Northwestern Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States