Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
NAlmefene Versus Placebo in Addition to Treatment as Usual on Craving in Behavioural Addictions
Sponsor: Nantes University Hospital
Summary
Behavioural addictions (BAs) \[gambling disorder (GD), food addiction (FA), sexual addiction (SA)\] may lead to disastrous consequences. They are often associated with other addictive or psychiatric disorders, and high rates of suicide attempts. Epidemiological studies report prevalence reaching 2.7% for GD, 5% for SA, and up to 7.9% for FA. Many similarities have been highlighted between BAs, as well as with substance use disorders. One core clinical similarity between those disorders is craving (uncontrollable urge to engage in rewarding behaviours), which has been consistently associated with diminished control over the behaviour and relapse. At present, no pharmacological treatment has been approved for BAs, but several medications have been tested. Among them, two opioid receptor antagonists - naltrexone and nalmefene - appear the most promising. By decreasing dopamine neurotransmission in the reward circuitry, they reduce both excitement for rewarding behaviours and craving. Compared to naltrexone, nalmefene seems to have a better safety. To date, no study investigated the efficacy of nalmefene as a pan-addiction treatment for BAs. Two clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy for the treatment of GD, but no clinical trial was conducted for FA and SA. The investigators hypothesise that nalmefene (36 mg/d), compared to a placebo, can have a therapeutic effect as an add-on to usual treatment for decreasing craving in several BAs.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
266
Start Date
2023-03-31
Completion Date
2027-07
Last Updated
2025-02-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Nalmefene
Week 1: 18 mg/d Week 2: 1. In the absence of ARs or in the presence of grade 1 or 2 ARs, 36 mg/d 2. In the presence of grade 3 ARs, 18 mg/d 3. In the presence of grade 4 ARs, treatment will be stopped immediately. Week 3 to week 5: 1. In case of acceptable safety profile at the 18mg/d dosage during week 2, the treatment will be maintained at the same dosage 2. In the presence of sustained grade 3 ARs at the 18mg/d dosage during week 2, the treatment will be stopped. 3. In case of acceptable safety profile at the 36mg/d dosage during week 2, the treatment will be maintained at the same dosage 4. In the presence of grade 3 ARs at the 36mg/d dosage during week 2, the treatment dosage will be decreased at 18mg/d 5. Whatever the dosage during week 2, in the presence of grade 4 ARs, the treatment will be stopped immediately.
Placebo
Week 1: 1 tablet/d Week 2: 1. In the absence of ARs or in the presence of grade 1 or 2 ARs, 2 tablets/d 2. In the presence of grade 3 ARs, 1 tablet/d 3. In the presence of grade 4 ARs, the treatment will be stopped immediately. Week 3 to week 5: 1. In case of acceptable safety profile at the dosage of 1 tablet/d during week 2, the treatment will be maintained at the same dosage 2. In the presence of sustained grade 3 ARs at the dosage of 1 tablet/d during week 2, the treatment will be stopped. 3. In case of acceptable safety profile at the dosage of 2 tablets/d during week 2, the treatment will be maintained at the same dosage 4. In the presence of grade 3 ARs at the dosage of 2 tablets/d during week 2, the treatment dosage will be decreased at 1 tablet/d 5. Whatever the dosage during week 2, in the presence of grade 4 ARs, the treatment will be stopped immediately.
Locations (13)
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
CHRU de Brest
Brest, France
CHU de Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, France
CH de La Rochelle
La Rochelle, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France
CHRU de Tours
Tours, France
Hôpital Paul Brousse
Villejuif, France