Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Monopolar Versus Biopolar Radiofrequency in OA Knee Pain
Sponsor: Assiut University
Summary
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial study will aim to evaluate the the efficacy and procedural pain of BRFA and to compare it with conventional technique (MRFA). And to compare the complications and time taken to complete the procedures.
Official title: The Clinical Efficacy of Monopolar Versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
40 Years - 60 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
90
Start Date
2022-11-14
Completion Date
2025-07-01
Last Updated
2026-08-05
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Monopolar radiofrequency
In monopolar group : . Inferomedial, superomedial, superolateral GN branches and nerve to vastus intermedius of the patients were identified with fluoroscopy and a 22 Gauge, 10 cm radiofrequency (RF) cannula with a 10 mm active tip was advanced to the targeted nerves under fluoroscopy guidance. The location of the RF cannula was visualized by anteriorposterior and lateral images. Sensory stimulation was applied at 50 Hz to determine the nerve position. Since the sensory stimulation threshold must be \< 0.6 V, nerve position was tested with the absence of fasciculation in the relevant area of the lower extremity upon 2.0 V stimulation at 2 Hz.
Bipolar radiofrequency
a similar technique will be used to insert the canula, except that, instead of one cannula two cannulae (approximately 10 mm apart) apart) will be inserted and no manipulation of cannulae was done to stimulate the target nerve as done in MRFA Target areas were similar to monopolar technique Each nerve will be ablated for 2 minutes in both the groups. All procedures were done by one pain physician who had more then 10 years' experience of radiofrequency procedures.
Locations (1)
Assuit University hospitals
Asyut, Egypt