Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
Sponsor: Peking University Third Hospital
Summary
GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.
Official title: Comparison of Modified Broström Repair + Suture Tape and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Generalized Joint Laxity Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 60 Years
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
114
Start Date
2021-11-01
Completion Date
2025-06-01
Last Updated
2025-04-11
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
Anatomic reconstruction operation
Anatomic reconstruction operation
Open Modified Broström procedure
Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery
Locations (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, China