Clinical Research Directory

Pulsed-field Ablation Vs. Sham Ablation to Treat AF

Sponsor: Charles University, Czech Republic

Summary

The study is planned as a single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Sixty sbjects will be randomized 1:1 to either: (i) EP study + PFA, or (ii) EP study + Sham ablation control. After informed consent is obtained, an implantable loop recorder (ILR) will be implanted within seven days, and an EP study will be scheduled for 30±5 days after ILR implantation. Patients in both groups will first undergo an EP study to rule out a concealed AV bypass tract and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Patients will not be randomized if SVT or concealed AV bypass tract is found during the EP study. Once an SVT or bypass tract is excluded, randomization will be performed. Patients randomized to Ablation will undergo PVI using the commercially-available pentaspline PFA catheter (Farawave, Farapulse-BSCI Inc). Patients randomized to the Sham-ablation Control group will simply undergo approximately 20-30 min of anesthesia with propofol and benzodiazepines in a similar manner as patients in the ablation arm. Primary endpoints will be assessed six months after the procedure. ECGs will be monitored using implantable ECG monitors (ILR) in all patients. There will be two co-primary endpoints (assessed at six months or at cross-over if Early Exit): 1. Freedom from recurrent AF/AT/AFL (post 2-month blanking), assessed as time-to first recurrence; 2. Quality of life according to Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of life (AFEQT) score at 6 months (or at cross-over if Early Exit).

Official title: Pulsed-field Ablation Versus Sham Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

Key Details

Conditions

Interventions

Locations (1)