Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT05833204
NA

BARBED vs. STANDARD Suture for Colporrhaphy at the End of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Sponsor: Universita di Verona

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, with more than 400,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the United States. As a consequence, even uncommon complications can affect large numbers of patients. Among potentially life-threatening events, vaginal cuff dehiscence complicates 0.14-1.38% of procedures, and any vaginal cuff complications (dehiscence, hematoma, bleeding, infection) are estimated to affect 4.7-9.8% of patients. In this scenario, any preventive strategy can provide clinically relevant benefits. Regarding colporrhaphy, only the adoption of a laparoscopic approach instead of a vaginal approach is supported by high-quality evidence. Our group demonstrated that the laparoscopic closure of the vaginal cuff after total laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces the incidence of vaginal cuff complications. Among other potentially effective interventions, the use of barbed sutures was associated with a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence than the standard suture. In a recent meta-analysis, the use of barbed sutures has been associated with a pooled incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence of 0.4% versus 2% after a traditional vaginal suture. However, this evidence is limited because most pooled studies were retrospective, and only two were randomized controlled trials. Moreover, these two randomized controlled trials had a very small sample size and were not powered to detect clinically relevant differences. On that basis, despite the promising utility of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the choice of the type of suture is not evidence-based but still guided by personal opinions, as well as by the preference and habits of the operators. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether the laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with barbed suture determines a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence and complications than conventional sutures after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Official title: Barbed Versus Standard Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

1614

Start Date

2025-03-01

Completion Date

2026-12-31

Last Updated

2024-06-28

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture

After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture (V-Loc ™, Covidien, Medtronic)

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with standard 0-caliber absorbable suture

After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber absorbable suture made of a coated braided thread (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc, Sommerville, NJ)

Locations (1)

AOUI Verona - University of Verona - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Verona, Italy