Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer
Sponsor: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Summary
The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.
Official title: Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Different Anastomosis Techniques(Parks Versus Bacon) in Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicentric and Randomized Controlled Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 75 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
256
Start Date
2023-08-08
Completion Date
2027-08-08
Last Updated
2025-12-18
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Parks technique
compare different operational styles of low rectal cancer
Bacon technique
Bacon technique
Locations (1)
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China