Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT05943444
NA

Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

Sponsor: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.

Official title: Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Different Anastomosis Techniques(Parks Versus Bacon) in Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicentric and Randomized Controlled Study

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 75 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

256

Start Date

2023-08-08

Completion Date

2027-08-08

Last Updated

2025-12-18

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Parks technique

compare different operational styles of low rectal cancer

PROCEDURE

Bacon technique

Bacon technique

Locations (1)

The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China