Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
CABG Based on CT-FFR Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography
Sponsor: Myongji Hospital
Summary
The aims of study are (1) to compare early and 1-year graft patency rates in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on conventional coronary angiography(CAG) versus cardiac computed tomography(CT)-derived fractional flow reserve(FFR), and (2) to demonstrate difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Based on COmputed Tomography-derived Fractional Flow REserve Versus Angiography (CABG-COREA Trial)
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
40 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
96
Start Date
2023-10-20
Completion Date
2025-10-01
Last Updated
2024-07-05
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Coronary artery bypass grafting based on conventional coronary angiography
Revascularized coronary arteries are decided based on conventional coronary angiography (quantitative coronary angiography)
Coronary artery bypass grafting based on cardiac computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
Revascularized coronary arteries are decided based on cardiac computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
Locations (1)
Myongji Hospital
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea