Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT06199180
NA

Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat PVI in Patients With Paroxysmal AF

Sponsor: University Medical Center Groningen

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Various methods exist for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including thermal ablation and pulse-field ablation (PFA). However, in cases requiring a second PVI for recurrent AF, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized in nearly 95% of instances post-acquiring a 3D high-density map from the left atrium (LA). Up to 85% of patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI exhibit pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, often identified as the cause of AF. PFA has demonstrated its safety and efficiency compared to RFA as a swift technique for performing ablation. Yet, whether PFA or RFA stands out as superior or safer when applied for a second PVI remains unclear, as no randomized controlled trial has investigated this comparison. The proposed REPEAT-AF trial aims to randomize 154 AF patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI, assigning them in a 1:1 ratio to either RFA or PFA. Each patient will receive an implantable cardiac monitor to precisely detect any AF recurrences.

Official title: Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 80 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

154

Start Date

2024-09-20

Completion Date

2028-09

Last Updated

2024-12-10

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

pulmonary vein isolation with RFA

Patients randomised to RFA will undergo PVI with point-by-point RFA.

DEVICE

pulmonary vein isolation with PFA

Patients randomised to PFA will undergo PVI with PFA.

Locations (1)

UMCG

Groningen, Netherlands