Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
CSP Versus BiVP for Heart Failure Patients with RVP Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Sponsor: The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Summary
The present study is a prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trail. It aims to investigate whether the efficacy of conduction system pacing (CSP) is non-inferior to biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients with heart failure and right ventricular pacing (RVP) requiring upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Official title: Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure Patients with Right Ventricular Pacing Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: a Prospective Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
66
Start Date
2024-01-01
Completion Date
2026-03-01
Last Updated
2025-03-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Conduction system pacing
Firstly, we will attempt LBBP if the patient is allocated to the experimental group. If we can not achieve LBBP successfully, then we will turn to attempt HBP.
Biventricular pacing
Implantation of RA lead, RV lead and LV lead are attempted using the standard-of-care technique.
Locations (1)
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China