Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
LPFC Organization in Emotion-Duration Difference Estimation
Sponsor: University of California, Santa Barbara
Summary
To support optimal behavior in daily life, goals and responses following emotional events should ideally incorporate not only the valence and intensity of prior emotional episodes but also their temporal features, such as the relative duration of positive vs. negative attributes. However, how specific brain regions contribute to the integration of temporal and emotional information and promote goal-directed response remains unknown. The goal of this study is to examine how specific brain regions track both emotional and temporal information of dynamic emotional events to inform other related brain regions to guide goal-oriented and context-appropriate actions. The investigators will scan healthy human participants using functional MRI (fMRI) while they view emotional image sequences and track the associated emotional and temporal (duration) information, and act accordingly. The investigators will employ multivariate patterns analysis and pattern similarity analysis to identify brain regions that represent (can decode) emotion, time, and their combined signals, as well as brain regions that represent the associated action goal. In addition, to infer the causal contributions of these brain regions in forming task-relevant representations (emotion, time, and action goal), the same participants will be recruited to receive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in these regions.
Official title: Lateral Prefrontal Organization in Emotion: Representational and Causal Mechanism - Duration Difference Estimation
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 45 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
50
Start Date
2024-01-29
Completion Date
2028-03-31
Last Updated
2025-04-02
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Emotion valence
Positive vs. Negative (temporally extended sequence)
Time
∆ Temporal evidence (i.e. relative time difference of stimulus-type exposure across a sequence: 1200 vs. 1800)
TMS Stimulation
FPl vs. mid-LPFC vs. non-PFC Control (S1); Specific LPFC region (vs. non-PFC active Control) function is manipulated with an inhibitory TMS protocol (cTBS).
Locations (1)
University of California, Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, California, United States