Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT06284174
NA

Effectiveness of Povidone-Iodine Versus Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solutions in Reducing Microbial Contamination in Spinal Surgery Wounds During Intraoperative Soaking.

Sponsor: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This study aims to assess the efficacy of intraoperative wound irrigation with iodine-containing and chlorhexidine-containing solutions in reducing bacterial colonization during spine surgery, and to determine which solution is more effective. Additionally, we aim to evaluate any side effects associated with the use of these two antiseptic solutions for wound irrigation.

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

105

Start Date

2021-01-01

Completion Date

2025-05-31

Last Updated

2025-05-29

Healthy Volunteers

No

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

Povidone-iodine solution; chlorhexidine gluconate

Before wound closure, each group will undergo different irrigation solutions for soaking the wound for three minutes followed by rinsing with copious saline.

Locations (1)

National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Tainan, Taiwan, Taiwan