Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison Between Drinking Water and Normal Saline in Irrigating Traumatic Wound
Sponsor: Patan Academy of Health Sciences
Summary
There is a controversy regarding the roles of the Normal saline and Tap water in irrigation of the wound. It has been suggested that antiseptic solution including normal saline has cytotoxic effect while tap water damages the fibroblast. There are no high level evidence to support one type of solution over other, systematic review have found no difference in wound infection between irrigation with normal saline vs tap water. There are ten randomized controlled trial comparing tap water with normal saline for irrigating wound published between 1992 to 2016. These RCT are analyzed in three systemic review and meta-analysis published on 2016, 2019, 2022, which showed that tap water and normal saline has no difference in terms of infection rate. The infection rate observed in various studies ranges from 0-11.5% in normal saline group and 0-12.6% in tap water group with no statistically significant difference.
Official title: Comparison Between Drinking Water and Normal Saline in Irrigating Traumatic Wound: Noninferiority Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
Any - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
440
Start Date
2024-03
Completion Date
2027-12
Last Updated
2024-03-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water
Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water and Normal Saline