Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Composite Plug Vs D-PTFE Membrane in Socket Preservation
Sponsor: Cairo University
Summary
The aim of the current study is to compare the effect socket sealing with flowable resin composite compared to dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane after filling the extraction site with xenograft particles in terms of soft and hard tissue changes, procedural time, post operative pain, patients' satisfaction, and cost effectiveness.
Official title: Evaluation of Socket Seal Using Flowable Composite Above Xenograft Compared to Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
20 Years - 70 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
20
Start Date
2025-05
Completion Date
2025-10
Last Updated
2025-03-26
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Socket preservation using xenograft and composite plug
Extraction of hopeless teeth will be followed by grafting the socket with xenograft and coverage with injected flowable composite plug which will then be stabilized using 5.0 polypropylene suture material with a figure of eight suture.
Socket preservation using xenograft and intentionally exposed d-PTFE
Extraction of hopeless teeth will be followed by grafting the socket with xenograft and coverage with d-PTFE membrane which will the be left exposed intentionally. This will be followed by securing the membrane using 5.0 polypropylene suture material with a figure of eight suture.
Locations (1)
Faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo university
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt