Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT06324955
NA

Language During Inhalational Induction

Sponsor: Boston Children's Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the impact of common (standard of care) language vs positive language used by clinicians during inhalational induction of anesthesia on anxiety and negative behaviors in children. This is a prospective randomized parallel group trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the common/standard language group or the positive language group.

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Positive Language vs Common Language During Inhalational Induction

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

5 Years - 10 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

128

Start Date

2024-04-08

Completion Date

2027-04

Last Updated

2026-01-09

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Standard/common language during induction

The anesthesiologist taking care of the patient will use scripted common/standard language during the induction.

BEHAVIORAL

Positive language during induction

The anesthesiologist taking care of the patient will use scripted positive language during the induction.

Locations (1)

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States