Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Sponsor: Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Summary
Hysterectomy, the most commonly performed gynecological operation, can be carried out through various methods using a wide array of instruments and energy techniques. Minimally invasive procedures such as robotic or laparoscopic approaches are linked to lower perioperative complications and quicker recovery when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. Furthermore, recent advancements in surgical tools and methodologies have facilitated endoscopic surgeries. Uterine manipulation plays a crucial role in laparoscopic hysterectomy by facilitating bladder dissection, positioning the ureters, and exposing the anterior and posterior vaginal fornices. It also prevents pneumoperitoneum loss by closing off the vaginal space. Despite these apparent benefits, there is no existing report comparing different types of uterine manipulators. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the Vcare and SecuFix uterine manipulators used in laparoscopic hysterectomy based on operative time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and subjective performance.
Official title: Comparison of VCare and SecuFix Uterine Manipulator in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Key Details
Gender
FEMALE
Age Range
35 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
10
Start Date
2024-05
Completion Date
2024-05
Last Updated
2024-05-03
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Interventions
SecuFix UM
All surgeries were performed using Secufix UM.
VCare UM
All surgeries were performed using VCare UM.