Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06398769
NA

VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Sponsor: Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Hysterectomy, the most commonly performed gynecological operation, can be carried out through various methods using a wide array of instruments and energy techniques. Minimally invasive procedures such as robotic or laparoscopic approaches are linked to lower perioperative complications and quicker recovery when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. Furthermore, recent advancements in surgical tools and methodologies have facilitated endoscopic surgeries. Uterine manipulation plays a crucial role in laparoscopic hysterectomy by facilitating bladder dissection, positioning the ureters, and exposing the anterior and posterior vaginal fornices. It also prevents pneumoperitoneum loss by closing off the vaginal space. Despite these apparent benefits, there is no existing report comparing different types of uterine manipulators. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the Vcare and SecuFix uterine manipulators used in laparoscopic hysterectomy based on operative time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and subjective performance.

Official title: Comparison of VCare and SecuFix Uterine Manipulator in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

35 Years - 65 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

10

Start Date

2024-05

Completion Date

2024-05

Last Updated

2024-05-03

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

DEVICE

SecuFix UM

All surgeries were performed using Secufix UM.

DEVICE

VCare UM

All surgeries were performed using VCare UM.