Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06404996
NA

Smart-phone Application Versus Conventional Paper for the Documentation of Voiding Dysfunction in Children

Sponsor: King Abdullah International Medical Research Center

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The objective of the research is to compare the written voiding diary method to the smart-phone diary, DryDawn®, which the investigators selected among several applications using specific criteria appropriate to our population. The investigators aim is to describe the method that proves to be most efficient by assessing which diary provides the best quality and amount of information, and draws the highest level of satisfaction from participants. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a questionnaire that was designed for use in this study.

Official title: Smart-phone Application Versus Conventional Paper for the Documentation of Voiding Dysfunction in Children: Which Diary is Most Advantageous

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

6 Years - 18 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

100

Start Date

2024-08-01

Completion Date

2026-02-28

Last Updated

2024-05-22

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

Smart-phone Voiding Diary

Smart-phone Voiding Diary

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Paper voiding diary

Conventional Paper voiding diary