Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Smart-phone Application Versus Conventional Paper for the Documentation of Voiding Dysfunction in Children
Sponsor: King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
Summary
The objective of the research is to compare the written voiding diary method to the smart-phone diary, DryDawn®, which the investigators selected among several applications using specific criteria appropriate to our population. The investigators aim is to describe the method that proves to be most efficient by assessing which diary provides the best quality and amount of information, and draws the highest level of satisfaction from participants. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a questionnaire that was designed for use in this study.
Official title: Smart-phone Application Versus Conventional Paper for the Documentation of Voiding Dysfunction in Children: Which Diary is Most Advantageous
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
6 Years - 18 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
100
Start Date
2024-08-01
Completion Date
2026-02-28
Last Updated
2024-05-22
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Smart-phone Voiding Diary
Smart-phone Voiding Diary
Paper voiding diary
Conventional Paper voiding diary