Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06409780
NA

Comparative Efficacy of CUS, CXR and CAD in TB Diagnosis in LMIC

Sponsor: University of Bari

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where resources for healthcare are often limited. While CXR is the standard imaging modality for TB diagnosis, its sensitivity and specificity can vary depending on factors such as the stage of the disease and the quality of the image obtained. This study endeavors to assess the diagnostic precision of Chest Ultrasound (CUS) relative to Chest X-ray (CXR) and CAD score in the detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) among both index cases and household contacts.

Official title: Comparative Efficacy of Chest Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray and Computer-aided Diagnostic (CAD) for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Low-Resource Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study From Ethiopia (CUSTB)

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

5 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

136

Start Date

2024-05-05

Completion Date

2025-04-30

Last Updated

2024-05-10

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Comparative analysis of CUS, CAD and CXR in pulmonary TB

The strumental analysis of pulmonary TB signs with chest ultrasound, chest x-ray and CAD will be compared in two different settings: index cases and household contacts