Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparative Efficacy of CUS, CXR and CAD in TB Diagnosis in LMIC
Sponsor: University of Bari
Summary
Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where resources for healthcare are often limited. While CXR is the standard imaging modality for TB diagnosis, its sensitivity and specificity can vary depending on factors such as the stage of the disease and the quality of the image obtained. This study endeavors to assess the diagnostic precision of Chest Ultrasound (CUS) relative to Chest X-ray (CXR) and CAD score in the detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) among both index cases and household contacts.
Official title: Comparative Efficacy of Chest Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray and Computer-aided Diagnostic (CAD) for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Low-Resource Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study From Ethiopia (CUSTB)
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
5 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
136
Start Date
2024-05-05
Completion Date
2025-04-30
Last Updated
2024-05-10
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Comparative analysis of CUS, CAD and CXR in pulmonary TB
The strumental analysis of pulmonary TB signs with chest ultrasound, chest x-ray and CAD will be compared in two different settings: index cases and household contacts