Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery
Sponsor: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Summary
BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, high-dose opioid contributes to adverse events associated with poor postoperative outcomes. There is growing evidence that nerve block-based multi-modal anesthesia protocols may reduce intraoperative opioid consumption without compromising analgesia management and consequently improve patient's early postoperative recovery. OBJECTIVE To determine whether opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block could improve early postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 45 to 70 years undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block (intervention group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72h after surgery, postoperative pain score, the incidence of postoperative adverse events and chronic pain. Other outcomes included endotracheal intubation duration, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.
Official title: Postoperative Recovery After Cardiac Surgery A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
45 Years - 70 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
80
Start Date
2024-04-22
Completion Date
2024-07-22
Last Updated
2024-07-30
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
opioid-sparing protocol
Patients in the OSA group was administrated with 0.5 to 1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and received PIFB combined with RSB after anesthetic induction. Patients in the control group were recommended to receive 2 to 3 mcg·kg-1 opioid-based sufentanil. PIFB was conducted at the T2 to T5 levels under ultrasound guidance. Each side received 20 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone. Bilateral RSB was conducted after the PIFB and the needle was inserted into the plane between the rectus abdominal muscle and its posterior sheath using an in-plane approach. After verifying needle placement, 15 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone was delivered to each side. In the control group, patients received no procedure and were administrated with traditional anesthetic protocol. Patients received continuous intravenous sufentanil (50 to 100 mg) and tropisetron (5 to 10 mg) at 2 ml·h-1 for the first 48 hours after surgery.
Locations (1)
Fuwai hospital
Beijing, China