Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
The Mere-measurement Effect of Patient-reported Outcomes
Sponsor: Medical University of Vienna
Summary
The use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) have become increasingly commonplace across many healthcare settings over the past two decades. The value of PROs is now acknowledged by healthcare providers and patients alike. However, to date, little is known about the best practices for formulating PRO measures (PROMS), but even more specifically, the effect had on the responding patients as a result of item word choice, emotional valence, or frequency of use. That is, 1) does the positive or negative wording of items affect the patient's perspective on the latent variable, 2) is there a degree of subliminal influence or measurement effects on their behaviour resulting from exposure to PROs, and finally, 3) is such an effect amplified with repeated exposure?
Official title: The Mere-measurement Effect in Patient-reported Outcomes: A Randomized Control Trial With Speech Pathology Patients
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
170
Start Date
2024-05-01
Completion Date
2025-12-22
Last Updated
2025-05-14
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Interventions
Patient-reported outcomes for speech disorders: positive
The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) aims to assess communication participation in all kinds of communication disorders. The Voice Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (VSEQ) monitors self-efficacy in individuals with self-declared voice problems before and after interventions. The Vocal Fatigue Handicap Questionnaire (VFHQ) and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) aim at reflecting vocal fatigue. Both have been adapted to reflect purely positive wording.
Locations (1)
Preston Long
Vienna, Austria