Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants.
Sponsor: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Summary
Dental implants have become more common treatment for replacing missing teeth and aim to improve chewing efficiency, physical health and esthetic. Researchers always tried to improve design, mechanical and chemical properties of implant. Major benefit of surface modification are to improve hydrophilicity, cell to implant adhesion and cell proliferation. These modification improve osseointegration and reduce treatment duration. In this study investigators are evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implant compared to conventional implant.
Official title: Comparative Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants - A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 75 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
10
Start Date
2024-07
Completion Date
2025-08
Last Updated
2024-07-25
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Dental Implant Surgery - Hydrophilic group
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant. Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.
Dental Implant Surgery - Conventional group
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant. Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.