Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison Of Implant Position Achieved With Fully Guided Versus Partially Guided Implant Placement
Sponsor: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Summary
Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable, viable and successful option to replace missing teeth. Ample studies have shown excellent survival and clinical success rates of dental implants for various indications.The correct three-dimensional (3D) positioning of an implant is considered a prerequisite for an optimal outcome.Computer assisted implant surgery maybe beneficial in patients with limited bone and proximity to anatomic structures.Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIP(Computer Assisted Implant Placement) and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placement(cPGIP).
Official title: Comparative Evaluation Of Accuracy Of Implant Position Achieved With Static Computer Assisted Fully Guided Implant Placement (sCAIP) And Conventional Cast Based Partially Guided Implant Placement (cPGIP)
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
20
Start Date
2024-07
Completion Date
2025-08
Last Updated
2024-07-25
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
guided implant surgery
Surgical guide is fabricated and fitted onto the patient's arch and implant is placed with guide in place.