Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06519383
NA

Comparison Of Implant Position Achieved With Fully Guided Versus Partially Guided Implant Placement

Sponsor: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Globally implant therapy is currently accepted as a predictable, viable and successful option to replace missing teeth. Ample studies have shown excellent survival and clinical success rates of dental implants for various indications.The correct three-dimensional (3D) positioning of an implant is considered a prerequisite for an optimal outcome.Computer assisted implant surgery maybe beneficial in patients with limited bone and proximity to anatomic structures.Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to investigate the accuracy of implant position achieved with static CAIP(Computer Assisted Implant Placement) and to compare this with the accuracy of conventional cast based partially guided implant placement(cPGIP).

Official title: Comparative Evaluation Of Accuracy Of Implant Position Achieved With Static Computer Assisted Fully Guided Implant Placement (sCAIP) And Conventional Cast Based Partially Guided Implant Placement (cPGIP)

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 80 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

20

Start Date

2024-07

Completion Date

2025-08

Last Updated

2024-07-25

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Interventions

PROCEDURE

guided implant surgery

Surgical guide is fabricated and fitted onto the patient's arch and implant is placed with guide in place.