Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Immediate vs Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement
Sponsor: University of Belgrade
Summary
The goal of this study is to assess clinical, radiological and patient centred outcomes of immediate and conventional implant loading protocols, and to compare clinical outcomes of these two different loading protocols (immediate and conventional) in combination with early implant placement of single implants in the esthetic zone of maxilla.
Official title: Immediate Vs. Conventional Loading for Early Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone of Maxilla: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
50
Start Date
2024-03-29
Completion Date
2027-03
Last Updated
2024-07-29
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Conditions
Interventions
Early implant placement with immediate provisional restoration
Implants placed following early implant placement protocol with soft tissue healing (6-8 weeks after tooth extraction). GBR procedure performed together with implant placement. Immediate provisional restoration will be delivered.
Early implant placement with delayed loading
Implants placed following early implant placement protocol with soft tissue healing (6-8 weeks after tooth extraction). GBR procedure performed together with implant placement. Delayed loading protocol followed.
Locations (1)
Implant Center, School of Dental Medicine, Univeristy of Blegrade
Belgrade, Serbia