Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Outcomes of PFA Vs. RFA for Patients with PSVT: a Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Study
Sponsor: Caijie Shen
Summary
The goal of this retrospective study is to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of pulses field ablation (PFA) Vs. radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The main question to answer is: Does the PFA was more effecient and safer that RFA for treatment of PSVT during procedure and after 1-year follow-up? Researchers will compare the acute and long-term efficiency and safety between PFA and RFA. 1. Recieved PFA or RFA 1 year ago 2. Finish the visit to the clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12 months for examinations and blood testings 3. Patients recieved PFA and PFA under propensity matched comparison according to differen variety of PSVT
Official title: The Safety and Efficiency of Pulsed Field Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia：a Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Study
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 80 Years
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
428
Start Date
2022-10-11
Completion Date
2025-06-30
Last Updated
2024-10-24
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Focal Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA)
Patients in the PFA group underwent ablation procedures utilizing a force-sensing PFA catheter for the treatment of PSVT.
Focal Radiofrequecy Ablation (RFA)
Patients in the PFA group underwent ablation procedures utilizing force-sensing RFA catheters for the treatment of PSVT.
Locations (1)
the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University
Ningbo, Zhejiang, China