Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT06585033
NA

Placebo Effect In Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation for Pain

Sponsor: Sahlgrenska University Hospital

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

Objective: To evaluate if spinal cord stimulation (SCS) performs better than placebo (no stimulation) in the long term to reduce persistent neuropathic leg pain refractory to medication and other conservative treatments in patients who have undergone lumbar spinal surgery. Study design: Multicenter, double blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. After a positive SCS test trial, participants (18-70 years) will be implanted with a non-rechargeable SCS system providing active, subthreshold stimulation and followed for 12 months in a blinded cross-over design. The primary outcome measure is the difference in change in leg pain intensity scores using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) between a 3-month period with optimized subthreshold stimulation, and a 3-month period with no stimulation, as compared to baseline. Quality of life, physical functioning, sleep quality, return to work, and reduction in medication use will also be investigated. Background: Up to 20% of patients who have undergone lumbar spinal surgery experience persistent back/leg pain leading to long-term reduction in functionality and quality of life. SCS is an established and safe, minimally invasive treatment for these patients when no further surgery is indicated and conservative therapies have been found to be ineffective. Placebo-controlled studies, comparing active and sham stimulation, were lacking until recently as traditional SCS relied on the patient feeling the stimulation (paresthesia). Technological progress with development of paresthesia-free stimulation forms now allows for the execution of placebo-controlled studies. A recent trial showing no significant difference in long-term effectiveness between active SCS and sham suffers from significant methodological shortcomings. This necessitates further sham-controlled studies to determine the effectiveness of SCS.

Official title: Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Therapy-Resistant Neuropathic Pain After Lumbar Spinal Surgery - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Cross-over Study

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

18 Years - 70 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

50

Start Date

2024-11-15

Completion Date

2027-06-30

Last Updated

2025-12-02

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

Spinal cord stimulation

Stimulation off

DEVICE

Spinal cord stimulation

Stimulation on

Locations (4)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital

Arnhem, Netherlands

Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University hospital

Stavanger, Norway

Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, Sweden

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care/Pain Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra

Gothenburg, Sweden