Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06609031
NA

EMR Versus CSP in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size

Sponsor: Fudan University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) less than 10mm in size.

Official title: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size: a Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

35 Years - 75 Years

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

270

Start Date

2024-10-01

Completion Date

2026-10-01

Last Updated

2024-09-25

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

endoscopic mucosal resection

The SSLs less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by EMR

PROCEDURE

Cold snare polypectomy

The SSLs less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by CSP

Locations (1)

Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan university

Shanghai, China