Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Mechanical Alignment vs Kalipered Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sponsor: Northwestern University
Summary
Knee replacement surgery can be performed in one of two ways. Traditionally the goal was for the new joint to be in a neutral position with respect to the femur (thigh bone). This is called Mechanical Alignment (MA). The neutral position is different than the human knee's natural position, so MA often requires the surgeon to make additional cuts to the ligaments and other soft tissue around the knee. More recently surgeons have started to place the new joint in a position that more closely replicates the natural alignment of the human knee. This is called Kinemetic Alignment (KA). KA can be done without additional soft tissue dissection but the procedure requires a higher level of precision that can be difficult to achieve in every case. Some studies have found no difference in outcomes between MA and KA, whereas others have found KA to be superior. But these were small studies or studies that did not consider patient-rated outcomes.
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Clinical Trial Comparing Mechanical Alignment vs Kalipered Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Medacta Spherika
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
21 Years - 79 Years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
95
Start Date
2024-08-01
Completion Date
2028-12
Last Updated
2026-03-24
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Mechanical Alignment (MA)
Primary TKA with the Medacta SpheriKA, utilizing either MA methodology.
Kinematic Alignment (KA) Interventions:
Primary TKA with the Medacta SpheriKA, utilizing either KA methodology.
Locations (1)
Northwestern Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, United States