Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
RECRUITING
NCT06634459
NA

POMEGRANATE Trial: Comparing Reia Pessary Versus Standard of Care Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment

Sponsor: Medstar Health Research Institute

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This multi-centered, randomized controlled trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of home use of the novel Reia System (RS), which includes the Reia pessary and applicator, compared to standard pessary care (Gellhorn or ring with/without support without knob) among women with stage II-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A total of 200 participants will be recruited among pessary naïve patients who are symptomatic and choose a vaginal pessary for management of their POP from study sites specializing in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS). Participants will be assigned via 1:1 randomization using computer generated numbers in permutated groups of variable block sizes to either the intervention (the Reia System, RS) or standard pessary care (SPC) stratified by site. Participation in this trial will involve a total of four visits over six months. The primary outcome measure will be satisfaction measured at the six-month time point. Secondary outcomes will include validated surveys to assess quality of life, number of self-management events, ease/difficulty of pessary insertion/removal, importance of ability to self-manage pessary, and adverse events. Specific Aims Aim 1: To compare satisfaction with pessary use and management between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary. Aim 2: To assess successful fitting, number of refitting visits, number of self-management events and continued pessary use over a 6-month period between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary. Aim 3: To compare ease/difficulty of pessary use and importance of ability to self-manage, as well as quality of life over a 6-month period between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary. Aim 4: To measure rates of adverse events and risk factors for adverse events over a 6-month period between subjects randomized to the Reia System and those randomized to standard of care pessary.

Official title: The POMEGRANATE Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pessary Home Management of Reia Pessary Versus Standard of Care Pessary for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Key Details

Gender

FEMALE

Age Range

18 Years - Any

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Enrollment

200

Start Date

2024-11-01

Completion Date

2026-10-30

Last Updated

2026-04-02

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

DEVICE

Reia System

Reia pessary

DEVICE

Standard of Care Pessary

Gellhorn pessary or ring with/without support without knob pessary

Locations (9)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, United States

MedStar Health

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

The University of Chicago

Northbrook, Illinois, United States

Dartmouth-Hitchcock

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Women & Infants Hospital in Rhode Island

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States