Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
COMPLETED
NCT06652334

Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Critically Adult Patients Undergoing Femur Surgery

Sponsor: Duzce University

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the regional anesthetic methods (not including general anesthesia) -spinal anesthesia, erector spinae plane (ESP) block- which are in routine practice in critically ill adult patients operated for femur fracture, in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics and clinical course, postoperative intensive care unit stay and hospitalization durations, pain scores, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Official title: Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Pain Management, Perioperative Hemodynamic Changes, Morbidity and Mortality in Critically Adult Patients Undergoing Surgery Due to Femur Fracture

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

65 Years - Any

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

40

Start Date

2024-03-20

Completion Date

2025-03-15

Last Updated

2026-08-24

Healthy Volunteers

No

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia

Spinal anesthesia was performed at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral space using intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine. After confirmation of adequate sensory block, propofol sedation was titrated to maintain a BIS value between 80 and 90.

PROCEDURE

Erector spinae plane block

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block was performed at the L4 level using a total volume of 30 mL local anesthetic solution consisting of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and normal saline. After confirmation of adequate sensory block, propofol sedation was titrated to maintain a BIS value between 80 and 90.

Locations (1)

Duzce University Faculty of Medicine

Düzce, Düzce, Turkey (Türkiye)