Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision for the Treatment of Adults With Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma, ICEMAN Trial
Sponsor: OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Summary
This clinical trial compares the effect of a narrow surgical excision (removal) to a wide excision for the treatment of adults with invasive cutaneous melanoma. Currently the standard of care is to take wide margins (boarder of healthy tissue surrounding the melanoma) when removing melanoma. Narrow margin excision removes a smaller amount of healthy tissue when surgically removing the melanoma. Narrow margin excision may be effective in removing the melanoma while also reducing surgical complications and improving quality of life for adults with invasive cutaneous melanoma.
Official title: ICEMAN (Intelligent Choice of Excision Margin): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision for Adults With Primary Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
1000
Start Date
2024-12-11
Completion Date
2027-12-31
Last Updated
2026-03-12
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
Biospecimen Collection
Undergo blood sample collection
Excision
Undergo narrow margin excision
Excision
Undergo wide margin excision
Survey Administration
Ancillary studies
Locations (1)
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States