Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
A Comparison of High-flow Nasal Oxygen and Conventional Nasal Cannula in Monitored Anesthesia Care for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Sponsor: Yonsei University
Summary
Sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection places patients at risk of desaturation, and high-flow nasal oxygen may reduce the risk. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of high-flow nasal oxygen during endoscopic submucosal dissection. We will compare the incidence of hypoxemia (defined as SpO2 lower than 90%) of conventional nasal oxygen cannula group and that of high-flow humidified oxygen-delivery system group during the procedure.
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
19 Years - Any
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment
200
Start Date
2024-11
Completion Date
2025-10-18
Last Updated
2024-11-14
Healthy Volunteers
No
Interventions
conventional oxygenation (nasal cannula)
conventional oxygenation arm will receive oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula, while Optiflow THRIVE arm will receive oxygen at 50 L/min via Optiflow THRIVE during the procedure.
high-flow humidified oxygen-delivery system (OptiFlow THRIVE)
conventional oxygenation arm will receive oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula, while Optiflow THRIVE arm will receive oxygen at 50 L/min via Optiflow THRIVE during the procedure.