Tundra Space

Tundra Space

Clinical Research Directory

Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.

Back to Studies
NOT YET RECRUITING
NCT06735716

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between the Robot-assisted System AVIAR (MX-02) Procedure and Conventional Manual Procedure in Patients Requiring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sponsor: Asan Medical Center

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted procedures using the positioning catheter control device 'AVIAR (MX-02)' versus conventional manual procedures in patients with Stable angina requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Official title: Comparison of Procedural and Clinical Outcomes Between Robot Assisted and Conventional Manual Approaches in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Requiring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Key Details

Gender

All

Age Range

19 Years - Any

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

80

Start Date

2025-01-15

Completion Date

2026-03-30

Last Updated

2024-12-16

Healthy Volunteers

No

Locations (2)

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, South Korea

The Catholic University of Korea, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital

Seoul, South Korea