Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
Comparison of the Effect of Two Methods on Laryngeal Edema in Endotracheal Cuff Inflation
Sponsor: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Summary
In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate perioperative laryngeal edema in patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery in the pron position, which the investigators use in our routine anesthesia practice, by using conventional and manometry measurement methods and ultrasonography, which the investigators also use frequently in our routine, and to evaluate complications related to laryngeal edema in postoperative service follow-up.
Official title: Comparison of Conventional and Manometry Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Perioperative Laryngeal Edema by USG in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery
Key Details
Gender
All
Age Range
18 Years - 65 Years
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
62
Start Date
2025-02-01
Completion Date
2025-07-10
Last Updated
2026-09-22
Healthy Volunteers
No
Conditions
Interventions
Conventional
The endotracheal tube cuff was manually inflated according to the attending anesthesiologist's routine clinical practice. The initial cuff pressure was subsequently measured using a cuff manometer and recorded. During surgery, cuff pressure was measured and recorded at 30-minute intervals without protocol-driven adjustment. This cuff management approach was part of routine anesthetic care and was not assigned by the study protocol.
manometer
The endotracheal tube cuff pressure was initially adjusted to 25-30 cmH₂O using a cuff manometer. During surgery, cuff pressure was measured and recorded at 30-minute intervals and was readjusted to 25-30 cmH₂O when necessary. This cuff management approach was part of routine anesthetic care and was not assigned by the study protocol.
Locations (1)
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Atasehir, Turkey (Türkiye)